A snarky defense of NPR hypocracy on firing Juan Williams

WASHINGTON - MAY 20: (L-R) Lawyer W. Mark Lan...Image by Getty Images via @daylife
This NY Times story reeks with put downs of those complaining about the firing of Williams.  Starting with its opening paragraph highlighting complaint letters from "viewers" and ending with a complaining caller making a pledge of support.  In between it is written like a brief in defense of former Times executive Vivian Shiller who exhibited unprofessional behavior in response to the outrage sparked by the firing.

Not addressed was the disparate treatment of opinion given by Nina Totenberg, a notorious liberal who appears to be in regular violation of the code of ethics that got Williams fired.

The story just does not live up to the NY Times standard for quality journalism.  It lives down to a standard for defending liberals who have screwed up as Shiller did.

I am not a regular listener to NPR.  I prefer the fair and balanced approach of Fox News.  But I am a regular reader of the NY Times and I would have liked to see them explore the inconsistency of the application of the NPR ethics code.

I really don't care if Totenberg exposes her liberalism in giving opinions.  I think it says more about the NPR agenda, and it is good to get that on the record.  I am really not that concerned about Juan Williams career which will probably be enhanced by his unprofessional treatment by Shiller and NPR.  But the Times and NPR owe us an explanation of why they view the rather innocent remarks of Juan Williams as verboten while they don't seem to mind liberal opinions from Totenberg.

The Washington Post did a better job of covering the fallout from the firing although it too failed to address the double standard issue with Totenberg.
Related articles
Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more

FEMA has lost the plot

Image
  @amuse @amuse · 4h DOGE: So-called career civil servants are openly defying the president. FEMA employees continue to divert disaster relief funds from hurricane victims in Western North Carolina to illegals in NYC. AG @PamBondi needs to make an example out of these people. Quote Elon Musk @elonmusk · 4h The @DOGE team just discovered that FEMA sent $59M LAST WEEK to luxury hotels in New York City to house illegal migrants. Sending this money violated the law and is in gross insubordination to the President’s executive order. Some of these people need to be fired. See also: Matt Van Swol @matt_vanswol · 1h HOW THE FUCK WERE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS GETTING $59 MILLION DOLLARS TO STAY IN LUXURY HOTELS IN NEW YORK… …WHEN FEMA TRIED TO KICK OUT 3,000 HURRICANE HELENE VICTIMS IN WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA OUT OF HOTELS IN THE WINTER?!!!!!! CAN SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS TO ME?!!!!!!
Read more