A snarky defense of NPR hypocracy on firing Juan Williams

WASHINGTON - MAY 20: (L-R) Lawyer W. Mark Lan...Image by Getty Images via @daylife
This NY Times story reeks with put downs of those complaining about the firing of Williams.  Starting with its opening paragraph highlighting complaint letters from "viewers" and ending with a complaining caller making a pledge of support.  In between it is written like a brief in defense of former Times executive Vivian Shiller who exhibited unprofessional behavior in response to the outrage sparked by the firing.

Not addressed was the disparate treatment of opinion given by Nina Totenberg, a notorious liberal who appears to be in regular violation of the code of ethics that got Williams fired.

The story just does not live up to the NY Times standard for quality journalism.  It lives down to a standard for defending liberals who have screwed up as Shiller did.

I am not a regular listener to NPR.  I prefer the fair and balanced approach of Fox News.  But I am a regular reader of the NY Times and I would have liked to see them explore the inconsistency of the application of the NPR ethics code.

I really don't care if Totenberg exposes her liberalism in giving opinions.  I think it says more about the NPR agenda, and it is good to get that on the record.  I am really not that concerned about Juan Williams career which will probably be enhanced by his unprofessional treatment by Shiller and NPR.  But the Times and NPR owe us an explanation of why they view the rather innocent remarks of Juan Williams as verboten while they don't seem to mind liberal opinions from Totenberg.

The Washington Post did a better job of covering the fallout from the firing although it too failed to address the double standard issue with Totenberg.
Related articles
Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more