FBI spent less than an hour questioning underpants bomber

Byron York:

The White House is not disputing a report that FBI agents questioned accused Northwest Airlines bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab for just 50 minutes before deciding to grant him the right to remain silent and provide him with a court-appointed lawyer -- a decision that led Abdulmutallab to stop talking and provide no more information.

The news came in an Associated Press reconstruction of Abdulmutallab's first hours in custody. The AP reported that Abdulmutallab "repeatedly made incriminating statements" to U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents who originally took him into custody. Then Abdulmutallab made more statements to doctors who were treating him for burns and other injuries. Only later did FBI agents interview him -- a session that lasted, according to the Associated Press, for "about 50 minutes." Before beginning the questioning, the AP continues, "the FBI agents decided not to give him his Miranda warnings informing him of his right to remain silent" -- apparently relying on an exception to Miranda that allows questioning about imminent threats.

After that, Abdulmutallab went into surgery. It was four hours before he was available for more questioning. By that time, the Justice Department in Washington had intervened. A new set of agents read Abdulmutallab the Miranda warning, telling him he had the right to remain silent -- and thereafter, Abdulmutallab remained silent.

On "Fox News Sunday," host Chris Wallace asked White House spokesman Robert Gibbs whether President Obama was informed of the decision to read Abdulmutallab his Miranda rights before or after it was done. Gibbs avoided the question, saying, "That decision was made by the Justice Department and the FBI, with experienced FBI interrogators." Gibbs stressed that "Abdulmutallab was interrogated and valuable intelligence was gotten as a result of that interrogation."

The more we learn about the handling of this matter the clearer it becomes that it was a major screw up by the Obama team. The screw up is a result of their lawfare bent which tries to make a criminal case of the enemy's efforts to make war against us. In war it is more important to find out the enemy's next move than to prosecute, because you have the right to hold the enemy combatant until the war is over anyway which gives you a lot of time to deal with whether there is a war crime to prosecute as opposed to the typical criminal case.

This screw up is one that the Republicans should hammer Obama on, because it is one that directly endangers us. Bin Laden's recent tape praising the attack makes clear that more of these guys are coming, and we just lost our best source on who they might be and when they might be coming. The incompetence here is staggering and indefensible.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Apple's huge investment in US including Texas facility