UK continues to free terror suspects

Daily Mail:

Four terror suspects described as 'highly dangerous' were freed by immigration judges yesterday despite fears that they will go on the run.

The decision brought an angry reaction from Home Secretary Jacqui Smith, who said she was 'extremely disappointed'.

The men, three Algerians and a Jordanian, are facing deportation as a threat to national security. They were arrested on Thursday night amid concern that they will try to flee.

But judges on the Special Immigration Appeals Commission ordered that they should be freed on bail. A fifth man arrested at the same time must stay behind bars.

One of the freed suspects is a 42-year-old Algerian who was arrested on terrorism and fraud charges in 1997.

Chemicals, catalogues of military equipment - including night vision goggles, radios and rockets - and bomb-making literature were found in his home.

The man - referred to only as Z - came to Britain in 1992 on a tourist visa and overstayed. He has admitted to leading a London group of the Algerian Islamic extremist organisation GIA, which has had links to Al Qaeda.

A source familiar with the case said: 'These men are highly dangerous individuals. There is no doubt whatsoever that they pose a threat to national security. They should not have been allowed to walk free.'

...
The only thing worse than UK immigration judges are the European Union immigration judges who usually award the terrorist money equal to a lottery winning ticket when they release them to prey on society.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more