There is not much Viagra in Obama's 'stimulus'

Donald Lambro:

Barack Obama's massive infrastructure spending plan to jump-start the economy isn't being criticized just by conservative critics. His chief economic adviser once called the idea one of the "less effective options" the president-elect is now promoting.

In a strategy paper in January that studied various economic stimulus proposals, economist Jason Furman wrote that spending hundreds of billions of dollars to repair or rebuild the nation's roads, bridges, rail lines and other infrastructure was "likely to be less effective in spurring economic activity."

The reason: Big infrastructure spending bills "do not provide well-timed stimulus or because there is considerable economic and administrative uncertainty about how they might work," Mr. Furman said.

While such public works spending "might provide an important boost to long-term growth," he doubted it "would generate significant short-term stimulus" because all too often the money is not pumped into the nation's economic bloodstream "until after the economy had recovered."

One expects Mr. Obama's fiscally conservative economic critics to beat up his big-spending, New Deal-era idea, but when his top economic adviser puts his plan's core in the "less effective options" column, that's news.

But even other supporters of his giant stimulus have begun voicing doubts about whether a huge spending package, possibly in the $500 billion to $700 billion range, can be spent quickly enough to have an impact on the recession. And some of them fear the spending may result in more wasteful pork-barrel spending.

...

The type of stimulus proposed by Obama is more like political porn, than a real long or short term fix for the economy. Like spending money on Viagra for purposes of masturbation, there is very little creative results after the moment. As much as Robert Byrd enjoys seeing his name on buildings and bridges in West Virginia, all that infrastructure spending has not made his state prosperous and Alaska does not owe its prosperity to Ted Stevens either.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Apple's huge investment in US including Texas facility