Afghan surge troops to be placed around Kabul

NY Times:

Most of the additional American troops arriving in Afghanistan early next year will be deployed near the capital, Kabul, American military commanders here say, in a measure of how precarious the war effort has become.

It will be the first time that American or coalition forces have been deployed in large numbers on the southern flank of the city, a decision that reflects the rising concerns among military officers, diplomats and government officials about the increasing vulnerability of the capital and the surrounding area.

It also underscores the difficult choices confronting American military commanders as they try to apportion a limited number of forces not only within Afghanistan, but also between Afghanistan and Iraq.

For the incoming Obama administration, a first priority will be to decide the greater risk: drawing down American forces too quickly in Iraq, potentially jeopardizing the gains there; or not building up troops quickly enough in Afghanistan, where the war effort hangs in the balance as security worsens.

The new Army brigade, the Third Brigade of the 10th Mountain Division from Fort Drum, N.Y., is scheduled to arrive in Afghanistan in January and will consist of 3,500 to 4,000 soldiers. The “vast majority” of them will be sent to Logar and Wardak Provinces, adjacent to Kabul, said Lt. Col. Rumi Nielson-Green, a spokeswoman for the American units in eastern Afghanistan. A battalion of at least several hundred soldiers from that brigade will go to the border region in the east, where American forces have been locked in some of the fiercest fighting this year.

In all, the Pentagon is planning to add more than 20,000 troops to Afghanistan in response to a request from Gen. David D. McKiernan, the top commander in Afghanistan. Those troops are expected to be sent to violent areas in the south. But they are expected to be deployed over 12 to 18 months. Nearly all would be diverted from Iraq, officials say.

The plan for the incoming brigade, then, means that for the time being fewer reinforcements — or none at all — will be immediately available for the parts of Afghanistan where the insurgency is most intense.

It also means that most of the newly arriving troops will not be deployed with the main goal of curbing the cross-border flow of insurgents from their rear bases in Pakistan, something American commanders would like and President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan has recommended.

...
First most of the surge troops in Iraq went to the Baghdad area. That area had been targeted by al Qaeda for disruption and there is some evidence that the Taliban and al Qaeda have similar plans for Afghanistan.

The story does not mention the Marine units. Currently the Marines are operating down in Helmand. they have been very effective down there and I suspect that the new Marine units will also be in that area. I suspect the Marines will be in the areas of infiltration and close to the enemy rat lines much the way they were in Anbar province in Iraq, while Army units concentrated on the area around Baghdad.

Comments

  1. Merv, I will be paying close attention to your analysis of the Afghanistan situation as I have a son going there in a few days. I am looking for quality information to help me deal with this stop-loss, second deployment. I am worried. I'm glad I found the Prairie Pundit. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Merv, I look forward to your analysis of the situation in Afghanistan as I have a son going there in a few days - 10th Mtn. Division. I am looking for quality information to help me deal with this stop-loss 2nd deployment. I am worried. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Apple's huge investment in US including Texas facility