Loser caucus upset with lack of defeat in Iraq, want to do more to lose

Washington Times:

Rank-and-file Democrats in Congress are criticizing the party's leaders for allowing the White House to sap momentum from the antiwar movement during the August recess.

"The White House is taking great advantage of the Democrats not pushing back," said Rep. Lynn Woolsey, California Democrat and co-founder of the antiwar Out of Iraq Caucus.

"We need bolder steps from the Democrats," she said. "The people of this country are waiting for some leadership — some bold leadership — from the people that they elected to be the majority of the House and the Senate."

An antiwar Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee said the party lost momentum in the war debate and later this month will likely again fail to force a U.S. troop pullout from Iraq.

The member did not want to be identified discussing leadership shortcomings.

Top Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, have responded by raising the pitch of the war debate since returning to Washington this week.

...

This tells you something about the lack of leadership in the Democrat party, but not the kind this bunch of losers is talking about. Democrats want to lose because they see some political advantage in it despite the high cost in future wars that will result from that lost, not to mention the genocides of "peace" that will follow their policy objectives. These people need to be politically defeated. So that America can win and protect these hapless fools from further mass murder attacks from an enemy that hates them more than it does anyone else. There is little to respect about their position.

Don Surber has a multi-link round up of the loser caucus whining about losing at losing.