CIA malpractice

Stephen Sprueill:


...the Senate Select Intelligence Committee report reveals that: "DO officials told Committee staff that they promised the former ambassador that they would keep his relationship with CIA confidential, but did not ask the former ambassador to do the same and did not ask him to sign a confidentiality or non-disclosure agreement" (p. 41). So Wilson was never obligated to keep his trip a secret, although if leaking his wife's name is a crime he should be indicted for ensuring it would happen when he wrote his op-ed. Oh, and if lying to reporters was a crime he'd be sharing a cell with Bubba already.
If the CIA did not require Wilson to keep his trip and his findings secret, it seems clear that the agency did not think anything of value would come from the trip. Or, it could have been their intent all along to undermine the case the for war. This revelation at a minimum makes it look more like a boodogle than a serious inquiry

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Apple's huge investment in US including Texas facility