Reuters says US is hindering its reporting from Iraq
Somehow they still manage to slip their sloppy anti American reporting by the hinderance. Reuters tends to hire Islamist in Iraq and in Israel and the Palestinian terrirories whose bias always seems to slip through the "editing process." They tend to take causulty figures over the phone from hospital personel who are not identified who describe all enemy casualties as civilian and usually exagerate those.
Since it is clear they want the enemy to win and tend to work with the enemy on some occasions, it is not surprising that some of their reporters would be under suspision. If Reuters left Iraq, it would probably improve the journalism almost as much as when al Jazeera left.
Somehow they still manage to slip their sloppy anti American reporting by the hinderance. Reuters tends to hire Islamist in Iraq and in Israel and the Palestinian terrirories whose bias always seems to slip through the "editing process." They tend to take causulty figures over the phone from hospital personel who are not identified who describe all enemy casualties as civilian and usually exagerate those.
Since it is clear they want the enemy to win and tend to work with the enemy on some occasions, it is not surprising that some of their reporters would be under suspision. If Reuters left Iraq, it would probably improve the journalism almost as much as when al Jazeera left.
Comments
Post a Comment