It is called the Supreme Court for a reason

 DC Daily Journal:

...

The U.S. Supreme Court, as the pinnacle of the nation’s judiciary, has faced scrutiny from a group of anonymous federal judges for its decisions to overturn lower court rulings, particularly those involving President Donald Trump’s administration, according to an NBC News report.

Twelve judges, appointed by both Democratic and Republican presidents, including Trump, expressed concerns about the Court’s use of emergency rulings to reverse lower court decisions.

However, the Supreme Court’s actions reflect its constitutional duty to ensure legal consistency and uphold executive authority, often necessitating swift intervention to correct missteps by lower courts.

“It is inexcusable,” one judge stated, critiquing the Supreme Court’s approach. “They don’t have our backs.” Yet, this perspective overlooks the Court’s responsibility to provide definitive guidance, ensuring that lower court rulings align with established precedent and constitutional principles.

The Supreme Court’s interventions often follow public criticism from Trump and his administration, who have challenged lower court judges for rulings perceived as obstructing executive policies.

For example, when Judge James Boasberg attempted to block deportation flights to El Salvador, Trump called for his impeachment on social media. Similarly, when judges halted Trump’s tariff agenda in March, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller labeled it a “judicial coup.”
...

The lower courts are trying to act like they are making presidential decisions.  That should be left up to the Trump administration.   I have no trouble with the Supreme Court overruling lower court judges.  It is one of the reasons the Supreme Court was created.