LNG exports are not the main reasons for price increases in US

 Washington Examiner:

Volatile energy prices are uniting some otherwise unaligned industrial manufacturing interests and environmental groups in a campaign to cut down on U.S. liquefied natural gas exports.

LNG is a major U.S. energy export and a big part of President Joe Biden's efforts to help Europe reduce its reliance on gas supplies from Russia, but higher export volumes can be tied to higher prices for gas domestically, driving up the cost of industrial processes and electricity generation.

Proponents of new export restrictions, who support a pullback up to and including a complete ban on LNG shipments overseas, are lobbying the Biden administration to take action to keep more U.S.-produced natural gas at home in hopes that it will lower prices and prevent them from rising back up to the 13-year highs they reached in June.

...

The main reason for natural gas price increases is Biden's idiotic restrictions on drilling.  Without those restrictions, the US would be producing more and could have significantly limited Europe's dependence on Russia for gas in the first place.  Trump told the Europeans that and was laughed at for being right.  Biden is the least intelligent President ever, especially when it comes to energy. And the European leadership was also not thinking strategically.  BTW, the Europeans could also have been using fracking to produce some of their energy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more