The Clinton campaigns threat to democracy aided and abetted by media

 Epoch Times:

...

“A tech company hacked the White House and spied on a sitting President. This should concern everyone. But the mainstream media refuses to cover it,” Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) wrote on Twitter. The lawmaker made similar comments during a Fox News appearance on Feb. 14.

“Yep, there was spying going on, and it was worse than we thought because they were spying on the sitting ​president of the United States,” Jordan told “Fox & Friends.” “And it goes right to the Clinton campaign.”

Durham’s Feb. 11 motion was connected to lawyer Michael Sussman, a former Perkins Coie lawyer who was charged in 2021 with lying to the FBI when he allegedly told the bureau that he wasn’t working for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign when he had given the agency now-debunked documents that allegedly linked the Trump Organization to a Russian bank. Sussmann has denied wrongdoing and pleaded not guilty in the case.

Meanwhile, Rep. Michael Turner (R-Ohio) said on Feb. 13 that the investigation uncovered a “new level of corruption” that raises “grave” concerns.

“I mean, this is a threat to our democracy itself,” Turner told Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures.” “It doesn’t matter really which political campaign this is or which political party this is. This is so wrong and allegations of such ​a ​level of illegal activity that goes directly to our faith in our own government that the truth must be found​.”

Sussmann, according to the recent filing, “had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive (Tech Executive 1) at a U.S.-based internet company (Internet Company 1) and the Clinton campaign​.” Records also show that he “repeatedly billed” the campaign for his work regarding the allegations around Trump and the Russian bank.

“In connection with these efforts, Tech Executive-1 exploited his access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data,” his filing ​stated. “Tech Executive-1 also enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing large amounts of Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract.”
...

See, also: 

The frightening breadth and unaccountability of the deep state

The tech executive allegedly responsible for the intrusion on Trump's internet and emails says his conduct was not against the law.   Durham apparently intends to challenge that assertion.  I suspect the relative silence of the mainstream media is because they were participants in the Clinton Russia hoax.

One of the things Durham is apparently doing is exposing what he believes to be the conflict of interest of the defense lawyers for Sussman.

And:

Jim Jordan: Dem’s Number One Election Lawyer Marc Elias ‘Was Involved in Spying’ on Trump

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more