Hillary Clinton's hackers?

 Washington Examiner:

...

In the filing, which was obtained by the Washington Examiner, Durham said he has evidence that “Technology Executive-1,” known to be former Neustar Senior Vice President Rodney Joffe, worked with indicted Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann to exploit internet traffic data and access “dedicated servers for the Executive Office of the President of the United States (EOP).” Joffe then “exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump,” the filing says.

Joffe also “enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university” who had access to “large amounts of Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract,” Durham said.

“[Joffe] tasked these researchers to mine Internet data to establish ‘an inference’ and ‘narrative’ tying then-candidate Trump to Russia,” he added. “In doing so, [Joffe] indicated that he was seeking to please certain ‘VIPs,’ referring to individuals at Law Firm-1 and the Clinton campaign.”

In other words, the Clinton campaign deliberately funded and ordered Sussmann and its other lawyers at Perkins Coie to monitor Trump and his allies, even after he took office, by any means necessary. The man they hired for this job, Joffe, hacked into private servers and exploited relationships he had with private companies to gather data he had no right to. If this isn’t considered criminal behavior, it should be.

Durham’s filing proves the campaign to undermine Trump went far beyond what many suspected. They didn’t just spy on Trump’s campaign, they spied on his White House, and they did so by hacking into the federal government’s confidential servers and then using what they found to manufacture the narrative of Russian collusion.

The worst part is that our intelligence community took the Clinton campaign’s “findings,” which were either highly misleading our outright false, according to Durham’s investigation, and ran with them. The FBI launched an investigation into Trump’s campaign, and congressional Democrats started their own investigation for the sole purpose of making Trump out to be a Russian stooge. And nearly three years later, few of the people responsible for this hoax have faced any consequences.

...

It gets worse: 

...

Slate, a left-wing website, reported on the alleged connection between Trump and Alfa Bank on Oct. 31, 2016 — days before the presidential election. The story claims that a group of computer scientists had sought to determine “whether hackers were interfering with the Trump campaign” (cute story) and unexpectedly found “evidence” of communication between Trump and Alfa Bank. The Clinton campaign jumped on the story, releasing a statement in response to it the same day, insisting this “evidence” could be “the most direct link yet between Donald Trump and Moscow.”:

...

But, according to a report from Washington Times in Oct. 2021, two cybersecurity firms say that Alfa Bank was hacked to give the appearance of communicating with Trump’s server. A lawsuit from Alfa Bank says that hackers allegedly “sent fabricated Domain Name System (DNS) digital queues to Trump domain ‘mail.trump-email.com’ to make it look like they were communicating with Alfa servers.”

This claim was supported by the FBI’s own conclusion that there was no communication between Trump and Alfa Bank.

If the Clinton campaign hired a technology company to “infiltrate” servers that belonged to Trump Tower, is it possible that the same company also hacked Alfa Bank to make it look like they were communicating with Trump?

...

And,  "Durham is saying that the Democratic candidate for president in 2016 engaged in a criminal conspiracy to infiltrate the opposition’s most sensitive, compartmentalized information and tried to manipulate data and information to politically damage her opponent."

...

I suspect that the investigators will track the payments from the Clinton campaign to the law firm and then to the other players in the conspiracy to spy on Trump and push a false narrative about Trump and Russia.

 Trump is rightly upset about what they were doing to him and his associates.  It would not surprise me to see a class action case against Clinton and his campaign to reimburse Trump and others on his team for attorney's fees to represent them in this fraudulent political operation by Clinton.  Durham should be considering indictments against those behind this operation.

See, also:

Hillary Clinton Tries to Smear Trump Again but Gets Obliterated Over Durham Spying Revelations