Vote fraud alleged in California

 PJ Media:

It’s now more than seven months after the contentious November 2020 election and California still has massive and downright fraudulent-appearing irregularities on its official voter registration rolls.

Recently, the election watchdog Election Integrity Project California (EIPCa) analyzed all VoteCal voter registration and voting history files from February 9, 2021. According to its website, VoteCal is “California’s centralized voter registration database that provides benefits to voters and election officials.” What EIPCa’s voter registration analysis found in the database was truly disturbing:

  • 7,700+ registrants had two votes credited to their voter registration ID number for the November 2020 election
  • Nearly 124,000 more votes were counted than voters with histories for the November 2020 election
  • 1.8 million+ ineligible registrants are currently on the rolls statewide
  • 108,000+ registrants had their out-of-country or out-of-state birthplace changed to “California” or “the United States” through the online or DMV voter registration system

Last week, EIPCa reported its troubling findings in a letter to California Secretary of State Shirley Weber. The question is, will Weber, a Democrat, actually do anything about these irregularities? If history is a teacher, the answer is it’s not very likely.

This latest letter is the third such report sent to the Secretary of State’s Office. The first two reports were sent to Sam Burgess in VoteCal–you know, the very department that claims to provide benefits for voters:

These reports have been ignored. Further, Mr. Burgess has not responded to reminders that he needs to contact EIPCa to obtain the passwords for encrypted Excel files.

Ironically, EIPCa’s analysis was compiled during the failure of the Democrats’ “For the People Act” — a left-wing attempt to federalize voting irregularities like the very ones found in California’s voter rolls. Of course, Democrats disguised their act as a voting security measure.

...

There is more.

This is another reason to have voter integrity laws that the Democrats oppose.  This looks like the real reason they oppose these laws and not their ridiculous claims that such laws keep blacks from voting. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more