Data mining for evidence of 2020 vote fraud

 Jay Valentine:

...

In December, my team was contacted by some data geeks with official election data from one of the swing states.  It was a set of about 4 million records, mail-in and absentee ballots with all the supporting data.  They asked if we could do anything with it.

We are not election guys, and we have day jobs doing pretty cutting-edge stuff in technology, but we do love to play with data.  The bigger, the more complicated, the better.

We built a spreadsheet with about 4 million rows, one for each of the ballots.  We saw a video some teenager did counting how many ballots were received before they were mailed out.  That's not a typo.

The U.S. Postal Service, which still finds letters from World War II in its system and piles of mail under bridges, delivered the ballots back to the state officials before they were mailed.  As tech guys, we did think this might be a new, disruptive technology, and we are still trying to recreate it.

So we ran the test on the data we were given.

Guess what!  About 30,000 — more, I recall — ballots were received before they were sent.  A bunch more, in the thousands, were sent and received the same day.  You get the picture.

O.K., big deal.  We took an analysis some kid performed, and we did it, too, but with the most cutting-edge software out there, one that could create a 4-million-row spreadsheet that responded in less than a second.

Right.  Our analysis was not the eureka moment. 

The eureka moment was when we created the SIMPLE BUTTON.  We created a button that said "ballots received before being mailed."  It is just a button on the screen!

Some of our team, who may not even vote and certainly do not care a bit about election fraud, were amazed at how much fraud they experienced — by seeing it in live data.  They touched the hot stove! 

So we built a couple of more queries.  Ballots sent and received in 24 hours, 48 hours!

The effect was the same to everyone we let hit the SIMPLE BUTTON — everyone was blown away.

Now comes the fun part.

There are a lot of publicly available data out there, and there are many, too many for us to track down, excellent analyses of those data.  It is evidence but not proof.

We are reaching out to our contacts for anyone who has those data — or any publicly available data of absentee and mail-in ballots.  Remember, some data were publicly available a few days after the election but now are behind a wall.

More data will become available as lawsuits proceed.  We want it.

It might be hard to check machine source code or run ballots through optical scanners to see if they were printed in Iran, but election data will eventually just come out.  They are, after all, public information.

We think there are tons of fun queries to build. 

How's "people who voted and do not live in the state," or "people who voted and are dead"?  Maybe "people who voted more than once"?  And the real clincher: "people who voted and live in a vacant lot"?  Using Google maps, we even show a photo of the empty lot, which is really cool.  Who knows?  You may be someone who says he lives at that address.

Running a SIMPLE BUTTON query does not generate a dead report.  You actually see the data move around, and, bam, you get a spreadsheet — 4 million rows!  Scroll down.  You see every instance.  You scroll to the bottom, and there's the total — and a lot of the columns are enough to change an election outcome.

Experience turns evidence into proof. 

We do not need Amazon or Google, and we are not losing any sleep about being deplatformed.  We are just fun data guys, with a lot of fraud investigation experience, doing entertaining data analysis.  After all, if there was no election fraud, there should be nothing to see.

If people can log onto a website, even those who want to question the data; hit a button to see not only how many dead people voted, but their names; see that vacant lot where 135 people claim to live, or the people who voted in multiple states — well, that is the way to relieve that frustration you feel.

So if you have data — public election data, non-confidential stuff — we are most happy to add it to the mix. 

...

There is more.

Deprogramming the election fraud may turn into a real challenge for the alleged winners.  What should be clear is that their attempt to make people "shut up" about election fraud is going to be continually challenged.