Rick Perry as an underrated politician?

Jim Geraghty:
...
Most underrated politician of 2014: I think Rick Perry is considered an also-ran in most people’s minds discussing 2016, and I think he may end up being a much bigger player in the discussion than everyone thinks.

Hiring Steve Schmidt is a little ominous, but Perry clearly has a solid record, he’s going to learn from his mistakes from last time, the issue of economic anxiety hasn’t gone away, and so he’s a figure who can appeal to the conservative base who has some substance to him. I’m not saying he’s going to win the nomination, but it’s easy to picture him lasting a lot longer than last cycle.
...
Rick Perry is good enough to win a lot of elections in Texas, but the liberals outside the state tend to see most conservatives as not smart enough to be President or in the case of Ted Cruz someone who is too scary to be President.

One of Perry's strengths  is that he finds solutions for problems that are easily understood.  He is not into the comprehensive Death Star approach to problem solving.

When I was a young lawyer prosecuting securities fraud cases for the state of Texas I tried to simplify indictments to a point that a jury would not get lost in the weeds of trying to prove everything the person did wrong.  The SEC tended to go the other route and their cases took longer to develop and try and were much more difficult to win so they tended to go for a consent decree.

I would try to limit the fraud counts to no more than three, but I always selected the ones that were inarguable.  As a result defense lawyers started coming in with agreements to plead guilty for prison time, something that was previously unheard of.  When they did go to trial we usually got guilty verdicts and long sentences and in one case I got the first maximum sentence verdict.

The bottom line is that my approach while simpler was also smarter and more effective, and I think Perry has shown the same success in Texas in growing the state's economy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more