More problems with the Benghazi cover up scandal

NY Times:

3 Republicans Not Satisfied as Rice Concedes Error on Libya


The ambassador to the United Nations, Susan E. Rice, said Tuesday that she incorrectly described the attack on the American mission in Libya but said she based her statement on the available intelligence.
One of the puzzling things about Obama's use of Susan Rice to explain what happened in Benghazi, is that he claims he likes and respects her, but he terribly misused her.  He has harmed her credibility with most non liberal Democrats.

What I got out of today's meeting is that she could not explain why they were still claiming that al Qaeda was "decimated" while at the same time they were taking their name off the talking points even though there was evidence of their involvement in the attacks.

I think DNI Clapper is probably in trouble on this matter, because his story keeps lurching from one false assertion to cover the next.  I have seen little to justify the high regard Obama has for Clapper.  Perhaps he is adequate in a plodding way, but he is not quick on his feet.  I still recall him saying that the Muslim Brotherhood was a secular organization.  How could he be DNI and be so misinformed?  At best he does not have his thoughts organized well enough to be a good witness.

Rice also strikes me as someone who has been on the wrong side of history in her previous experience at the State Department, and she does not appear to have grown intellectually over time.  Her tenure at the UN has been marked by failure.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more