Iraq election results roiled by disqualifications

Guardian:

Iraq's election results have been thrown into further doubt after 52 candidates were disqualified, threatening the slight lead of challenger Ayad Allawi and risking heightened sectarian tensions.

Two candidates were ruled out on grounds of links to the outlawed Ba'ath party by a judicial review panel of the independent electoral commission. Both were elected for Allawi's Iraqiya list, which won two seats more than the State of Law bloc led by Nouri al-Maliki, the incumbent prime minister, in the 7 March polls. Spokesmen for Iraqiya said they would be replaced by members of the same list.

Observers said they expected a more important decision when the panel rules tomorrow on up to nine more winning candidates. Maliki's list stands to benefit most from any significant changes.

"The ruling of the review panel is politically motivated and could be detrimental to the whole democratic process in Iraq," warned al-Iraqiya's Mustafa al-Hiti.

The commission announced that a partial vote recount would begin next week.

Iraqiya won 91 seats compared with 89 won by al-Maliki's bloc. Allawi's allies have said they do not believe the final outcome will be dramatically different but fear a resurgence of sectarian anger.

The panel, chaired by Ahmed Chalabi, a Shia former deputy prime minister who was close to the US before the 2003 invasion, was set up to examine ties to Saddam Hussein's Ba'ath party, dominated by Iraq's Sunni minority.

Iraqiya won 91 seats compared with 89 won by al-Maliki's bloc. Allawi's allies have said they do not believe the final outcome will be dramatically different but fear a resurgence of sectarian anger.

The panel, chaired by Ahmed Chalabi, a Shia former deputy prime minister who was close to the US before the 2003 invasion, was set up to examine ties to Saddam Hussein's Ba'ath party, dominated by Iraq's Sunni minority.

...

It is not clear from the story whether Allawi could name new people to take the place of those disqualified or if a special election would be necessary. With Chalabi running the panel the results are probably seen as suspect by Allawi backers including the Sunnis.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more