Texas Democrats try to suppress voter ID

Dallas Morning News:

House members learned the hard way Tuesday that red ties and butterflies may be free, but killing a voter ID bill is expensive.

A grueling, all-day talkathon by Democrats wandered from a monarch butterfly watch program at state parks to the size of Amarillo's convention center. There were frequent quips about the red ties most in the chamber – male and female – were wearing.

Jacksonville Democratic Rep. Chuck Hopson handed them out. Red ties are his sartorial trademark and the gifts were "an expression of solidarity with all the members," a Hopson aide explained.

But as Day Five dawned on Democrats' attempt to talk to death a bill to force voters to present more identification at the polls, goofiness and good feelings quickly dissipated.

...

House GOP caucus leader Larry Taylor of Friendswood said Democrats now have proved they can't work with either Straus or his more controlling predecessor, former Speaker Tom Craddick, R-Midland.

Taylor said neither Straus nor Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst, the Senate's presiding officer, could stave off a groundswell of support for voter ID requirements.

"Statewide, across party lines, across races, 70 percent of the people support having a photo ID at the polling place," Taylor said. "They would like to have us do that to protect the integrity of elections."

...


The Democrat argument against the bill is at best circular and at worst incoherent. If they were really concerned about IDs being a problem they could secure them at the same time they register people to vote. It just is not that hard to get a valid ID. But, it would inhibit groups like ACORN that ahve become notorious for fraudulent registrations.

Perhaps that is what all this stalling is about. Democrats may be running a protection racket for ACORN's abuse of the law.

If Taylor is right, and I suspect he is, 70 percent of voters will have a reason to vote against Democrats next year.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more