The Democrat terror two step

Charles Hurt:

Those dramatic new moves you're seeing to the strains of polka music these days out of Washington are called the Tango with Terrorists.

It's become a favorite among Democrats from President Obama on down who want to be on both sides of every debate about how to protect the United States from terror.

They want to be strong and soft.

Tough and sweet.

Uncompromising and compliant.

As a top aide to Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said incredulously yesterday: "What?"

The only thing concrete about how Democrats are fighting this war on terror is that nobody knows.

Led by Obama, Democrats have spastically embraced a pinwheel policy that seems to change by the day and leaves political opponents -- and certainly the terrorists -- scratching their heads.

They want to hunt the terrorists down and kill them in their tracks while treating them respectfully and giving them judicial rights enjoyed by American citizens.

They acknowledge that nasty and aggressive techniques for eliciting information from captured enemy combatants has turned up valuable intelligence but want to ban any of those unpleasant techniques.

...

To the extent that Democrats really want to fight terrorist their policy is incoherent. They would much rather fight Republicans. They are also much better at fighting Republicans than terrorist.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more

Apple's huge investment in US including Texas facility

Blaze: Apple announced a $500 billion commitment to infrastructure in the United States over four years, its largest commitment to domestic spending to date. Apple said it will expand teams and facilities in Arizona, California, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Oregon, Texas, and Washington as part of its new spending. With a new facility in Houston, Texas, Apple will reportedly double its investment in advanced manufacturing along with increasing investments in AI and silicon engineering. The company said in a press release that the Houston facility will produce servers to support Apple Intelligence, the "personal intelligence system that helps users write, express themselves, and get things done." ... The Texas facility will be for advanced technologies.   Texas has become a place that is very supportive of the tech industries.  Austin and Houston have seen much of the tech growth in the state.  Texas universities have been active in the AI field.
Read more