Obama's injustice for terror victims

Arthur Herman:

IMAGINE a terrorist setting off a bomb in your home, killing 17 friends and family members. Two years later, you learn authorities have caught the mastermind of the attack, who's confessed not only to bombing your house but other acts of terrorism.

Then, six years later, you hear that the charges against the killer have been dropped and that he might go free - while those who arrested and questioned him may face congressional investigation and even jail time.

If you can get your mind around this nightmare, then you can appreciate the feelings of retired US Navy Cmdr. Kirk Lippold, former skipper of the destroyer USS Cole.

On Oct. 12, 2000, terrorists set off a bomb alongside the Cole as it was peacefully moored in the port of Aden. The blast killed 17 members of Lippold's command and wounded nearly 40 others.

On Thursday, proceedings against the bombing's mastermind, Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, were suspended and the charges against him dropped, thanks to President Obama's executive order putting on hold all military tribunals for terror suspects. The charges may be reinstated later, depending on the results of the administration's review of these issues. Where that review is leading is unclear - and al-Nashiri's release, despite his confessed guilt, becomes a real possibility.

All this is more than just a direct slap at the men and women of our armed forces. There's good reason to worry that leftist ideology will lead our government to see the rights of terrorists as more important than the safety of those who fight them.

On that same day, after all, Obama's nominee to head the CIA, Leon Panetta, was being pressured by members of Congress to say that the new administration intends to prosecute the Americans who interrogated al-Nashiri and other terror detainees.

This is a bizarre twist on "Crime and Punishment," where terrorists commit the crimes, and those who stop them get punished.

Yes, Panetta and Attorney General Eric Holder have both said they don't want to see CIA or military officials prosecuted for doing their jobs. But if al-Nashiri's lawyers manage to get him out of prison, congressional Democrats and the US left will demand that those who tried to keep him from killing other Americans - indeed, every person who took an active role in the Bush War on Terror - take his place.

...

Obama officials insist that al-Nashiri will ultimately face justice. The president himself says he is just waiting for "the right judge" for the case. But don't hold your breath. Al-Nashiri is one of three CIA detainees who were waterboarded in the weeks/months after 9/11, in order to force him to provide information about al Qaeda in Yemen and possible plans for other attacks.

...

The guy did provide a lot of valuable information after his persuasive interrogation. Many on the left view that as a get out of jail free card. There are many in the Democrat party in Congress as well as in the left wing anti war groups who want to prosecute those responsible for getting the information out of the terrorist. That is a warped sense of justice. If the Democrats really try this they will be defeated in the next election.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more