Soundbite wars

Fred Barnes:

Winning isn't enough. To gain from a presidential debate, there must be sound bites that appear on TV day after day and show your opponent in an unfavorable or embarrassing light. John McCain was better than Barack Obama in their first presidential debate last night. But the debate produced no knockout sound bites--none I noticed anyway--that might harm Obama's campaign. So McCain's win isn't likely to affect the presidential race.

That's unfair, but politics is often unfair. McCain was far more forceful and aggressive than expected. And he had Obama on the defensive for roughly an hour of the 90-minute debate. But that doesn't matter much since Obama was never rattled and made no obvious blunders.

I concluded that mere winning doesn't count for much in presidential debates, while sound bites do, after participating as a questioner in 1984 in the first debate between President Reagan and Walter Mondale. It was the best night of Mondale's entire political career and Reagan often stammered and occasionally looked flustered.

But the effect on the race was nil. Why? Because as bad as Reagan was in the debate, no memorable or damaging sound bites emerged. Reagan escaped, and in the second debate recovered effectively with a quip about Mondale's youth and inexperience.

...

I think a compilation tape of Obama saying, "I agree with John on that," or "John is absolutely right," could be effective and make a good McCain ad. It would certainly annoy Obama's backers, but it would also make it harder for Obama to slip off some points that don't favor Democrats.

Rush Limbaugh was the started the use of compilation tapes and has used them too effect in attacking Democrats and the media. It would not surprise me to hear it Monday on his program. If the McCain people are on their toes this weekend it will be in YouTube that will go viral.

Byron York has already compiled a list for his report on the debate at National Review Online. He found at least eight.

Via Hot Air a YouTube of three of the "John is right" moments:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more