The battle for America

A.J. Strata:

Surprisingly, the liberals want a fight for the future of America over the issue of national security. In their world there is no war, simply crimes to fight in court. In their world we cannot monitor communications from people who are willing to die to kill as many of us as possible. We must protect the terrorists’ rights to plan and execute deadly attacks once they have crossed our borders.

The left is West Wing, the rest of want something like 24. The liberals are for the Gorelick Wall that ensures we will not be able to stop a future 9-11 attack, since they are desperate to pretend 9-11 changed nothing.

...

The NY Times is expecting to put terrorists back on the street again. And they seem giddy about it....

...

Yes, the idea is for the freeing of terrorists who have been caught red handed planning to kill Americans simply because the FISA Court could not accept their new, more limited role. FISA did not want to taint their process with NSA information. The prudes.

And the NY Times, like the rest of the liberal echo chamber, seem to not have sufficient intellectual horse power to discern between monitoring terrorist communications and monitoring anyone and everyone willy-nilly. They fear they are important enough to be monitored by Bush. Or maybe their plan is to try and be as much of a risk to our national security as terrorists so Bush will be goaded into partisan dirty tricks. They could be immature enough to believe partisan dirty tricks and illegally impacting on-going efforts to stop terrorist attacks will win them more votes next year? Apparently so.

...

Oh, those poor terrorists and their civil rights. They have such respect for rights and humanity themselves how could anyone even think of trying to listen in on their plans to kill people. Their actions and intentions are irrelevant - they need protection from the bullies in the Bush administration and the left will provide that protection.

...

There is much more.