Surely there is a better Democrat candidate than Kamala Harris
...
In my first track race in high school, I ran a 220 yard sprint. After 110 yards, I was in first place, all by myself. The basic problem was that there were still 110 yards to go, during which I saw the back of every jersey for the seven guys who passed me. Anyone with a pulse would bring more excitement to Democrats than Joe Biden would. But in either choosing Harris or having her forced on the party in Joe’s revenge on Pelosi and Obama, they could not have selected a worse candidate. She is not popular by any standard. She comes off as smug. When she talks, she makes every second grader seem like a Nobel laureate. She has avoided taking a single question or doing a press conference for nearly a month since her installment by fiat. All of those around her know that if she has to speak extemporaneously, the stock market might drop 800 points, World War III might start, and the English language might sue Harris for acts of violence. She can presently hide behind her teleprompter and the lapdog media can inflate her status, but in the end, she will debate and she will speak in an unscripted manner. And at that time, many Democrats will either choose Trump for the safety of the Republic or simply opt to stay home rather than vote for a thin-skinned ignoramus in heels.
*Digital Tricks. Nearly every week we learn that our digital overlords have played some tricks with their algorithms, always to the detriment of Trump and advantage of Harris. ChatGPT still doesn’t believe that someone tried to kill Donald Trump. Google would not let you look up the subject. Google let Harris’s people modify news headlines to her benefit. Whenever they are caught with all 20 fingers and toes in the cookie jar, they claim that it was a glitch, a mistake, a one-off event. One has to remember that around 30 percent of each party will vote for its candidate no matter what. The remaining 40 percent, primarily those in around five or six states, can go either way and their voting patterns may determine who wins. The more that they see big tech once again putting its sloppy paw on the scales, the more that they will feel that Donald Trump is getting a raw deal. We saw it in the polls after each legal filing against the former president. Most felt that the legal attacks were political and Trump’s popularity only went up. The digital games get exposed and the public knows that they are getting played.
*Selection of Walz. Vice presidents do not do very much in office, but their selection is like a Rorschach test for the presidential nominee. Kamala Harris chose a governor who let his largest city burn down over three days of BLM mayhem. She selected a fellow who clearly has lied about the exact nature of his military service. She chose a guy who put tampons into boys’ bathrooms. It’s one thing to weakly support trans-mania; it’s another thing to push it to the extreme. They thought that they would get a folksy Midwesterner to pull the wool over the eyes of the rubes in Michigan, Wisconsin, etc. Instead, they have another lefty extremist who makes Trump and JD Vance look like the founding members of the Women’s Christian Temperance Union.
...
Democrats appear desperate to defeat Trump by not only demonizing him but also making up crimes in order to criminalize him. It is one of the most dishonest campaigns in recent memory. In doing so they are mostly ignoring issues that voters care about such as enforcing US borders. When you compare the actual records of the Trump presidency to that of Biden, Inflation was more under control under Trump and he was not wasting taxpayer money on foreign wars. Democrats are also ignoring Kamala Harris's weaknesses from word salads to bad decisions making.
Comments
Post a Comment