The government greed of the Schumer-Manchin IRS expansion

 Quin Hillyer:

There is plenty to dislike in the inflationary, tax-hiking spendathon that Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) concocted with Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), but one provision is so bad as to be a fatal poison pill. Democrats want to sic tens of thousands more IRS agents on ordinary, often-innocent taxpayers.

This bill would provide $80 billion more to the IRS (above its existing budget) during the next decade to pay for 87,000 new enforcement agents — among other wrongheaded things, such as new cars for agents and more office rent, even though most IRS agents choose to work from home.

As the Manchin bill can pass only with unanimous Democratic support in the Senate, every Republican candidate in the nation should wrap this provision (if it passes) around the neck of each Democrat who votes for it.

There can be no doubt that the IRS needs major reform and perhaps more resources than it now has. The major problems, though, are not in enforcement but in service. IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig himself admits that his agency answers only “around 19 or 20 percent” of calls. The government’s official national taxpayer advocate, Erin Collins, said the call-answering rate has not exceeded 10% for each of the past two years.

When IRS auditors target a taxpayer, the audits disproportionately affect low-income earners, and the auditors themselves often err. Yet the IRS acts effectively as investigator, prosecutor, and judge, with almost no chance for nonwealthy taxpayers even to access an ordinary court of law to challenge the IRS’s star chamber. Moreover, the agents with whom taxpayers actually deal are not the ultimate decision-makers, but taxpayers can neither talk to those real decision-makers nor find out their names — even if the decision-maker reverses the original agent’s ruling that had been in favor of the taxpayer.

And when only 10% of taxpayer calls are even answered, it’s virtually impossible to get complaints or even basic questions heard. There is an official “Taxpayer Bill of Rights” that is supposed to guard against such procedural abuses, but — get this — it contains no effective enforcement provision. The Taxpayer Bill of Rights might as well guarantee every taxpayer a free Corvette, because none of its guarantees are actually deliverable.

...

One of the complaints against the British crown and Parliament listed in the Declaration of Independence was that they had “erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.”

...

There are not enough billionaires in this country to justify this abuse.  The government greed in pushing this kind of bill is palpable.  How many people does the IRS need to answer the phone call and respond to messages?  If they did that they would have less need for agents and audits.

See, also:

Democrats Latest Plan: Target Middle Class Americans with IRS Audits, Keep Billionaire Loopholes Open

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains