The FBI's rushed hit job on Trump

 Jeff Dunetz:

...

With that kind of information, the DOJ couldn’t take the time to issue a search warrant, even though the former POTUS was already cooperating. The FBI had to get into Mar-a-Lago very quickly so that no one trades America’s military secrets to China for a lifetime of free Chinese takeout. On top of the secrets, the agent who rummaged through Melania’s closet wanted to bring one of her outfits home for his wife (they had a wedding to go to over the weekend). Two other agents wanted to get home in time to watch America’s Got Talent.

But the Wall Street Journal reported that the speed was unnecessary;

Attorney General Merrick Garland deliberated for weeks over whether to approve the application for a warrant to search former President Donald Trump’s Florida home, people familiar with the matter said, a sign of his cautious approach that will be tested over the coming months.

Wait for a second!

Merrick Garland, the AG, Mr. I don’t want to do anything to make the DOJ look political, sat on the search warrant for a few weeks.  Was it because he wanted to get the raid closer to the mid-terms, or was it because he suspected that Donald Trump was about to announce a run for President? It doesn’t matter either way it stinks. It didn’t need to be done quickly. It was nothing but a fire drill.

Folks, we have to send letters and emails and protest peacefully (without hurting any of those involved). We must let the DOJ and the entire Biden administration know that It is unacceptable for the DOJ and the FBI to become political tools just because they don’t like his politics.

...

Well, their actions certainly did not help the President's political enemies that are pushing the Jan. 6 investigation that few people care about. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more