Motives for search of Mar-a-Lago questioned

 Victoria Taft:

...

These circumstances raise one question and may answer another. First, why conduct a smash and grab raid at the “early stages” when you haven’t investigated enough to know what you need to make your case?

This goes to another important issue. Was this why the warrant was so vague and “overly broad”? How could a warrant that had under its aegis every piece of paper ever generated during Trump’s presidency not be overly broad? “Overly broad” is a legal term of art suggesting we are veering into unconstitutional territory. That’s a Fourth Amendment no-no and it goes to the very reason why patriots escaped to the colonies and declared their independence from the Crown.

It may answer the question of why the FBI combed through Melania Trump’s under lovelies and hired a safecracker. They didn’t seem to know what they were looking for.

This is why it appears this was a raid in search of a crime.

...

When you consider it was a raid by some of the same agents who had pushed the Russian collusion hoax it could not possibly be in its early stages.  I think Taft is right that it looks like a raid in search of a crime.

See, also:

Disgraced Peter Strzok attempts to keep Russian collusion myth alive with desperate 

dodge

And:

 Trump Derangement Syndrome Is Real and It Needs to be Studied


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains