Manchin bill will raise the price of energy, manufacturing through taxation

 Washington Examiner:

Sen. Joe Manchin’s (D-WV) "Inflation Reduction Act" may not lower inflation , but it is a much better name for the bill than what the legislation actually does: raise taxes on energy producers and manufacturers. A more accurate name for the bill would have been "The Joe Manchin Tax on Energy and Manufacturing."

Manchin claims his legislation doesn’t raise taxes on energy producers or manufacturers at all. In fact, Manchin went so far as to claim, "There’s nothing on taxes at all" in the bill. "There’s not one penny in change on taxes," Manchin told reporters Monday.

This is an odd claim to make, considering the Joint Committee on Taxation says the bill’s 15% Alternative Minimum Tax on Large Corporations will raise taxes by $314 billion over the next 10 years. What is the point of creating a minimum tax if it isn’t going to raise revenue? $314 billion is an awful lot of pennies.

Worse for Manchin, and for everyone if this legislation should become law, is which industries are hit hardest by the Manchin tax hike. According to the JCT, the manufacturing industry is hit the hardest , absorbing 49.7% of all new revenue raised by the minimum tax provision. West Virginia’s coal sector is also hit hard by the Manchin tax hike, with the Tax Foundation estimating that coal industry taxes will go up 7.2%. Utilities are also hit by an average 4.4% tax hike under the Manchin plan. Consumers will know exactly whom to blame when their energy prices go up.

Clearly sensitive to the charge that his tax hike will hurt manufacturing and energy production, Manchin is touting a separate piece of legislation he says Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) have promised to pass after the Senate passes the Manchin tax hike.

This "permitting reform bill" is good legislation. It reforms the National Environmental Policy Act so that major projects like oil pipelines can only be held up by environmental activists for a maximum of two years in court. It also codifies reforms made by former President Donald Trump that make it easier for infrastructure projects to comply with the Clean Water Act. And it makes it easier for utility companies to build new power lines by consolidating permit-issuing authority under the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

These are all good, commonsense reforms that should become law. But the Democrats control the House of Representatives, and there is zero chance they will pass legislation that makes it easier to build fossil fuel infrastructure, especially reforms first enacted by President Trump. Manchin is a fool if he thinks the House will pass this bill or that the Democratic-controlled Senate will find time in its busy schedule to act on it.
...

It is a bill that deserves to be defeated.  It is typical Democrat greed. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more