Biden's incoherent Afghan policies

 Washington Examiner:

When the Taliban recaptured control of Afghanistan before the U.S. military withdrawal was complete, President Joe Biden said no one could have anticipated that the Western-backed government in Kabul would collapse so quickly.

"The intelligence community did not say, back in June or July, that, in fact, this was going to collapse like it did," Biden told George Stephanopoulos on Good Morning America last year. “Not even close ... I don’t think anybody anticipated that.”

A month earlier, Biden had rejected predictions that a Taliban takeover was inevitable. “No, it is not,” he said. Pressed on whether his own intelligence reports had concluded otherwise, Biden replied, “That is not true.”

But one person had predicted over a decade before ordering the withdrawal of American forces that the Afghan government was not a reliable partner. His name was Joe Biden.

Shortly before being sworn in as vice president in 2009, Biden returned from a trip to meet Hamid Karzai, then Afghanistan’s president, totally disillusioned with the government in Kabul. Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE), who would go on to be secretary of defense in that administration, described having to grab a shouting Biden by the arm and trying to calm him down.

Biden had voted for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. He was the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee at the time.

“But the clash with Karzai and the rest of a discomforting trip left Biden filled with a sense that Afghanistan's war was ensnaring Washington and could be unwinnable,” Reuters reported. “He returned to Washington with a stern warning to President-elect Barack Obama: Now is not the time to put more troops in Afghanistan.”

"It wasn't simply impatience," Jonah Blank, a longtime former Biden aide who accompanied him on the 2009 trip, later told the outlet. "Year after year, his optimism started to drain away."

“The war in Afghanistan shattered Joe Biden’s faith in American military power” is how the Washington Post put it in 2020.

In his arguments against the Afghan surge that Obama ordered early in his presidency, Biden mainly displayed little faith in Afghanistan’s government and Washington’s ability to transform it into a capable ally.

“As I hear what you’re saying, as I read your report, you’re saying that we have about a year,” Biden said to Gen. Stanley McChrystal, as recounted in Bob Woodward’s 2010 book Obama’s Wars. “And that our success relies upon having a reliable, a strong partner in governance to make this work?” When McChrystal said, "Yes," Biden turned to the U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan and asked, “In your estimation, can we, can that be achieved in the next year?”

The answer was no, for the reasons Biden suspected: the Afghan government's corruption.

“I understand the government is a criminal syndicate,” Gen. David Petraeus said. “But we need to help achieve and improve security and, as noted, regain the initiative and turn some recent tactical gains into operational momentum.”

“If the government’s a criminal syndicate a year from now, how will troops make a difference?” Biden shot back. He argued that the government would collapse swiftly without U.S. support. “No one recorded an answer in their notes,” Woodward wrote of Biden’s question.

...

Perhaps incoherent is not the right description.  He just lied to the country and perhaps himself when he pulled US support from Afghanistan.