Russia's nuclear threats suggest they know they are losing in Ukraine

 Washington Examiner:

Russia is upping its World War III rhetoric. Vladimir Putin has threatened any nation that directly intervenes in Ukraine with retaliation via "strategic" weapons — "strategic" meaning "nuclear." At the same time, Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov says the risks of a nuclear war are now "very significant."

On Russian state media, prominent commentators this week suggested that a nuclear war with the West wouldn't be too problematic because Russians would go to heaven, whereas Westerners would simply perish. The fact that this was allowed on state media is also highly significant, and obviously, there is nothing more serious than nuclear war.

Yet this is not the time to bow before Russian threats. Indeed, Biden must respond to Russian aggression forcefully. As Americans understandably look with concern at Russia's escalation, they must also be reminded that this showdown is not simply about whether Ukraine survives as a sovereign democracy or becomes a Russian puppet state. This conflict is about the future of the entire free world.

Ukraine's survival matters for reasons that go beyond its immediate moral and political merits. This moment is also shaping a message about what America, and by association what the free world, will tolerate in the 21st century. A sacred principle of the post-1945 democratic international order is that a sovereign democracy cannot be extinguished simply because a more powerful nation desires it. If Biden wavers, he will be sacrificing the relative peace and cooperation that was hard-won in World War II.

...

Russia is clearly weaker now than it was before it started its war in Ukraine.  The threat to go nuclear is evidence that they know they could not win a conventional war with the US and NATO.  The nuclear threat is an attempt to get the US and NATO to stop providing weapons for Ukraine's defense.  Putin and the Russians started a war that they cannot win at this point and they would also lose a nuclear war.

See, also:

US Artillery Delivered to Ukraine Is More Than Guns, It Is a Game-Winning Change From the Present (plus some war and weapons pr0n)

The weapons and ammo should outperform the Russian counterparts. 

And:

Putin's propagandists simulate NUKING Europe with missiles hitting in 200 seconds and 'no survivors' in angry TV outburst at UK - as ex-Nato chief warns Russia could declare 'all-out war' in days

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more