Chinese Americans lambast racist critical race theory

 Washington Examiner:

The oldest Chinese American association has denounced critical race theory as "a hateful, divisive, manipulative fraud."

The Chinese American Citizens Alliance of Greater New York criticized the theory, which argues that the law and legal institutions are inherently racist, in a statement released on Tuesday.

"From its very roots, CRT is racist, repressive, discriminatory, and divisive," the organization wrote, noting that the school of thought is "heavily influenced by such hate promoters as Marx, Lenin, Gramsci, Schmitt, Marcuse, Foucault and Freire."

WEBSITE LAUNCHED TO TRACK CRITICAL RACE THEORY TRAINING AT OVER 200 COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES

CACAGNY singled out critical race theory's treatment of Chinese Americans as a cause for concern, arguing that Chinese Americans have "come into CRT's crosshair" by virtue of their status as "white by adjacency" as a result of the minority group "overcom[ing] discrimination and achiev[ing] upward mobility," particularly in the field of higher education.

"For top colleges, CRT uses the ruse of multiple-criteria holistic admissions, which allows Harvard to reject Asians with better academic and extra-curricular credentials than those of admitted applicants. ... If smearing Asians this way isn’t hate speech, then what is? Call it diversity, equity and inclusion," the statement continued.

In a call to action, CACAGNY lamented President Biden's decision to rescind former President Donald Trump's executive order banning critical race theory at the federal level and asked members to vote for state legislators who oppose the theory. Biden's choice to lead the Department of Education, Miguel Cardona, oversaw the creation of a critical race theory class in his home state of Connecticut.

...

Critical Race theory is racist at its core and should be banned throughout America.  Those implementing it should be investigated as violators of the civil rights of those discriminated against because of it. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more