Oil exports would have a quicker impact on Russia than LNG

Fuel Fix:
The quickest way for the United States to weaken Russia’s influence and help allies abroad is by exporting its crude oil — not its gas, Continental Resources CEO Harold Hamm told lawmakers on Wednesday.

Sending natural gas overseas requires the construction of multibillion-dollar facilities capable of transforming it into a liquid by chilling it to -240 degrees. And while one such liquefied natural gas export terminal exists in Alaska andanother is being constructed in Louisiana, it could be years before others are online.

By contrast, liquid crude oil can be immediately dumped into tankers and transported around the globe, Hamm said in testimony to the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

“Making America a world leader in LNG exports is a worthy goal, but . . . if we want to have an overnight impact on today’s global events, we can immediately begin exporting crude oil, which does not have the same infrastructure constraints,” Hamm said. “Crude oil exports are possible immediately and may be used as a diplomatic tool to weaken the influence of our geopolitical adversaries.”
...
With the US still importing, I am not sure what the exports would do to drive down the prices the Russians get.  While I am not opposed to exporting, I suspect it would increase the price of some American oil.   What I prefer is a free market.  I don't like the artificial market manipulation imposed by the US on the supply of oil and its sales.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more