Texans not persuaded by Obama's stimulus talk

Houston Chronicle:

...

“Redistributing hard-earned tax dollars will do far more to expand the power of the federal government than it will to stimulate the economy,” said Rep. John Culberson, R-Houston. “This legislation is a Trojan horse that liberals are using to ultimately turn America into France, because it contains massive expansion of multiple federal programs that are utterly unrelated to stimulating the economy.”

During a generally convivial hour-long session with House Republicans, several Texans, including Dallas Rep. Jeb Hensarling, bluntly told the president why they couldn’t support his plan. Hensarling, the Number 2 Republican on the House Budget Committee, said he told Obama that the “debt we incur today will eventually be paid by my 6-year-old daughter, my 5-year-old son and (the president’s) two daughters.”

Rep. Pete Olson, R-Sugar Land, gave Obama credit for “a nice gesture” in coming to Capitol Hill but said the president’s visit did little to persuade skeptical Republicans.

“In the end, you still cannot borrow or spend your way to prosperity,” the newly elected Republican said.

Rep. Ted Poe assailed “a mind set in Washington that the bureaucrats know how to better spend our money than the people do,” while Rep. Kevin Brady, R-The Woodlands, said spending on programs such as education, health care and museums “do not boost the economy.”

“I can’t find an economist anywhere who will admit that contraceptives, zoo exhibits and repairs to the Jefferson Memorial are serious economic boosts,” Brady said.

...


Brady and Poe seem to have the better arguments. Republicans should continue focusing on the specifics of the bill so that it will be discredited with the voters too.

Comments

  1. Hamster7:40 PM

    Gee. I wish you were just as tough on President Bush mult billion dollar war in Iraq

    Where was conservative outrage when President Bush was pushing 600 billion dollars of spending on the Iraq war.
    All of that money was borrowed.

    Why are Conservatives all for borrowing money to spend on training Iraq's police and army, rebuilding bombed out schools, restoring power and drinking water , bribing tribal leaders and paying insurgents not to fire on US troops.

    But when it comes to spending money here in America they call it wasteful.

    I think we should ship the Republicans in congress to Iraq.

    They seem to have far more sympathy and support for oil rich Iraqi's than for unemployed Americans

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more