Bad advice from the NY Times?

Adam Brodsky:

IT'S always risky to believe The New York Times, and the paper's front-page lead story Wednesday - claiming John McCain's attacks have "backfired" - vividly illustrates why.

Imagine: The Times counseling McCain not to attack Barack Obama. That's a knee-slapper. The story, based on a Times/CBS News poll, actually refutes its own suggestions that McCain's jabs are boomeranging.

Nonetheless, the paper may have hit on a disconcerting trend: Large numbers of voters just aren't bothered by Obama's flaws.

Obama, the poll reports, led McCain by a whopping 14 percentage points - even though far more people (64 percent) thought McCain is well-prepared for the presidency than thought Obama is (51 percent).

Another finding, meanwhile, offers a key clue to Obama's popularity: Seven in 10 voters see his "temperament" and "personality" as well-suited for the Oval Office.

For months, critics have claimed he's all style and no substance. Apparently, style is winning.

Take McCain's "attacks." As the nation chooses its first new president since 9/11, McCain's criticisms - linking Obama, for instance, to domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, who bombed the Pentagon - seem pertinent. Likewise, you'd think Americans would fret over Obama's planned tax hikes. Yet raising these points doesn't seem to faze most voters.

Again, the Times gets it wrong in claiming that doing so is costing McCain many votes. The paper supplies no evidence - and, in fact, admits that "the vast majority" of those polled had not changed their opinions of either candidate in the last few weeks. If only a few have shifted, then the recent "attacks" haven't really hurt McCain much, after all.

Then again, they haven't helped much either; all the polls have him trailing. The question is: Why haven't they?

Yes, the media gave Obama a free ride. Yes, the 72-year-old McCain isn't exactly blessed with powers of persuasion. Yes, he and his campaign pull punches - refusing, for example, to remind folks of Obama's long friendship with America-hating Jeremiah Wright. (McCain's problem isn't that he's too negative; if anything, it's that he's not negative enough.)

...

On the other hand, you can probably dismiss Obama's negatives and still wonder why he's ahead, given that he brings so few positives to the table: no national record, no great accomplishments, no experience.

...

It is because he does not move too fast and has a non scary smile.

Brodsky does raise a great point about the Times story on the negative attacks. It raises the question of just what the Times thinks would be helpful for the McCain campaign to do to oppose their chosen one.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more