Intercepting the Somali pirate motherships

Reuters:

International naval forces operating off the coast of Somalia must be prepared to take on pirate ‘mother ships' if they are to stem rampant piracy, a senior maritime official said on Thursday.

"We want pre-emptive action against the mother ships before the pirates carry out a hijacking," said Captain Pottengal Mukundan, director of the London-based International Maritime Bureau, which monitors international piracy, referring to the ships pirates use as bases from which to launch attacks.

"The positions of the mother ships are generally known. What we would like to see is the naval vessels going to interdict them, searching them and removing any arms on board. That would at least force the pirates to go back to Somalia to pick up more arms before they could come back again," he told Reuters in an interview.

...

But the laws governing what navies can do to take on the pirates are complex. Only if pirates are caught in the act of piracy -- actually boarding a ship and seizing it -- can a naval ship intervene with the full force of international law.

Arriving 30 minutes after a vessel has been boarded, when there is a degree of uncertainty over whether those on board are pirates or not, is often too late, experts say. Denmark recently had to return some suspected pirates to Somalia because it couldn't prove they were pirates after they were seized.

So fuzzy are the laws that the U.S. admiral commanding the NATO fleet was not sure what his rules of engagement would be just days before he left to take up his command this month.

Mr. Mukundan said there were currently about four ‘mother ships' -- seized dhows or other larger fishing boats anchored near international waters -- being used by pirates.

The pirates live on the mother ships, storing arms, fuel and other supplies on board, and then target ships, which can include fuel tankers, by catching up to them in high-speed boats and boarding them with rope ladders while heavily armed.

Mr. Mukundan acknowledged the legalities of taking on ‘mother ships' were tricky, but said it could be done if governments gave their naval forces instructions to do it.

...

The first thing they need to decide is whether they are going to engage in lawfare against pirates or warfare. If it is lawfare, they are giving the pirates a substantial advantage. If it is warfare the pirates would not stand a chance.

I don't think President Jefferson was too concerned about the legal modalities of dealing with pirates. He sent the military in to destroy their base of operations.

If someone thinks that they need some legal cover to deal with the problem, I think the US Security Counsel could authorize the sue of force against the Somali pirates. Then you sink the mother ships and destroy their base of operations and you will not have a pirate problem.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Is the F-35 obsolete?