Robert Novak's brain tumor

Howard Kurtz:

Robert D. Novak, one of Washington's best-known and most controversial columnists for nearly half a century, has a brain tumor.

Novak, 77, said yesterday that the diagnosis was made Sunday and that he was admitted to Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, where he will soon begin treatment. "I will be suspending my journalistic work for an indefinite but, God willing, not too lengthy period," he said in a statement.

"He is talking," said an assistant, Amanda Carey. "Everyone's optimistic right now. He's in good spirits." Novak's office said no tests had yet determined whether the tumor was malignant. He became ill when he and his wife went to visit their daughter near Cape Cod, Mass.

Last week, while driving his black Corvette, Novak hit a homeless pedestrian at a downtown Washington intersection. He said he did not realize he had struck anyone until a passing bicyclist stopped him. The 86-year-old pedestrian suffered minor injuries, and Novak received a $50 ticket.

...


I am curious if he is at the same hospital that diagnosed Ted Kennedy's brain tumor. I think I will stay away from cap Cod for the time being anyway.

It was just a little over a week ago that I got to see Novak speak in person at an event in Austin, Texas sponsored by American's for Prosperity. He was sharp and dark in his analysis of the 2008 Presidential race explaining all the reasons why the Republicans should lose, except for the fact that the Democrats nominated Obama. I have been reading his material for over 40 years and I think he is still a sharp guy. I wish him a speedy recovery.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more