Obama's base split over his plan for troops in Iraq

McClatchy:

Barack Obama's plan to build up U.S. forces in Afghanistan while keeping perhaps 50,000 troops in Iraq has triggered a deep rift among antiwar activists, a reminder of the difficult tasking facing the presumptive Democratic nominee as he tries to broaden his appeal.

...

Some hailed Obama's trip as an important breakthrough.

"So far the trip has been out of the park. It's an enormous moment," declared Eli Pariser , executive director of MoveOn.org, which supports Obama. He hedged about Obama's troop commitments, however: He said he wasn't fully aware of Obama's call for a residual force in Iraq and was trying to get a sense from MoveOn members on their views about Afghanistan .

Sister Simone Campbell , executive director of NETWORK, the national Catholic social justice lobbying group, was less enthusiastic.

"It was a significant step forward," she said, "but it was only a step."

Others were simply annoyed.

Barbra Bearden , spokeswoman for Peace Action, called Obama's comments about Afghanistan "a bit disheartening."

Ian Thompson , lead organizer in Los Angeles for Act Now to Stop War & End Racism, an antiwar group, found Obama's Afghanistan position similar to that of President Bush and presumptive Republican presidential nominee John McCain .

"What this shows is that Barack Obama does not really represent any policy shift," he said.

Republicans thought that Obama supplied them with new political ammunition. Obama supports withdrawing U.S. combat forces within 16 months after becoming president, while McCain has called such fixed timetables artificial and unrealistic. He says troops should come home when conditions on the ground warrant it, and not before.

...

The anti war left has trouble even supporting our operations in Afghanistan. They will cause Obama a lot of heart break if he is elected. He will find himself like Lyndon Johnson, abandoned by many in his own party as he tries to tight rope between the extremes. Some may stay home and others may hold their nose and vote for him. Kerry had the same problem in 2004 trying to put forward a responsible position and still appease the irresponsible in his party.