No ones shows up for Chavez's war

Investor's Business Daily Editorial:

From photos of Venezuela's just-mobilized soldiers, it wasn't hard to see that something was terribly wrong. Slouching atop their tanks after Chavez ordered 10 divisions dispatched to Colombia's jungle frontier, they looked bored out of their minds and unsure of what to do next. Tactically, a mobilization of tanks to the Mekong Delta-like river network on the frontier had the making of a quagmire — literally.

Meanwhile, as markets trembled, the Pentagon yawned. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he expected no conflict and added that "the Colombians can take care of themselves." The U.S. Southern Command, in a bit of thinly disguised mischief on its Web site, noted how fine its new U.S. base in Suriname near Venezuela's now-unguarded eastern frontier was going.

But that was small rum compared to the real problem with the Chavista tank show: No one was there to greet them on the other side of the border.

Colombia, in fact, refused to send troops to match Chavez's (and Ecuador's) 9,000-man mobilization. The military said it wasn't interested in a war with them and would continue to focus instead on its fight against FARC terrorists.

After a string of provocations, such a reply was striking. Colombia's battle-hardened troops could squash the militaries of its two bordering nations if so inclined. Instead, they left Chavez high and dry as the one leader who really had given a war and nobody came.

It says even more about Colombia and where it's going.

On Tuesday, President Bush offered Colombia our support. But rather than seek aid, President Alvaro Uribe asked Bush to appeal to Congress to pass of Colombia's free trade pact, which has been on hold for about two years now. "It will help President Uribe counter the radical vision of those who are seeking to undermine democracy," Bush said in a national address.

So here is Colombia, a nation provoked to war by two barbaric neighbors spoiling for a fight, and the only thing it wants from its big ally up north is the passage of a trade pact to drop tariffs on U.S. goods and encourage investment in both countries.

Perhaps economics have something to do with why Colombia is turning the other cheek. Venezuela and Ecuador are led by radical Marxist caudillos who've severely mismanaged their own nations' economies, chasing out foreign investment and creating shortages.

...

In short, while Chavez has wreaked economic ruin to drive military confrontation, Colombia has sped toward a prosperity that would only be enhanced by a free trade pact with the U.S. Denial of such a pact sends a strong signal that Congress has no interest in encouraging Colombia to continue on its positive path.

...

Will the Democrats in Congress be on the side of Chavez and FARC? so far that has been the case. Under Uribe Colombia has privatized state business and the stock market has soared higher than Obama's rhetoric. Private investment is also coming into the country. If the Democrats do not approve this trade package it will demonstrate they are as lacking in intelligence as Chavez.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more