McCain embraces the muddle of multilateralism

NY Times:

In a wide-ranging speech on foreign policy, Senator John McCain sought Wednesday to distance himself from the unilateralism that has been a hallmark of the Bush administration, saying Americans must, in the words of the Declaration of Independence, show “decent respect to the opinions of mankind.”

“We cannot build an enduring peace based on freedom by ourselves, and we do not want to,” Mr. McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee for president, said in remarks here to the Los Angeles World Affairs Council. “We have to strengthen our global alliances as the core of a new global compact.”

The speech, the most extended exposition of foreign policy views and principles the senator has delivered during the campaign, was an apparent effort to draw attention to his positions on topics other than his oft-repeated insistence that the nation stay the course in Iraq. He touched on nuclear proliferation, global warming, free trade and fighting AIDS in Africa.

But, turning directly to the war toward the end of his remarks, he said a precipitous withdrawal “would be an unconscionable act of betrayal, a stain on our character as a great nation.” He called for the United States to maintain a presence in Iraq until it could be transformed into a “peaceful, stable, democratic” state.

The campaign of Senator Barack Obama, Democrat of Illinois, immediately responded by saying in a statement, “John McCain is determined to carry out four more years of George Bush’s failed policies, including an open-ended war in Iraq that has cost us thousands of lives and billions of dollars while making us less safe.”

...


Obama's statement shows he does not comprehend counterinsurgency warfare and the amount of time necessary to defeat an enemy determined to wage an insurgency. His policies will make this a much longer war and his retreat from Iraq will be a disaster for that country and this one.

But, McCain's embrace of multilateralism is no winner. Just look at places like Darfur, and the Sudan to see the slow genocide that is perpetrated while multilateral negotiations muddle along. Iran is another example of the failure of multilateral negotiations stop stop a determined adversary in its quest for a nuclear bomb. Then there is Zimbabwe where Mugabe's genocide on the cheap is unabated by the international community. Liberals and tyrants probably like to hear this bow to multilateralism, but their victims mush shudder and still go to bed in fear and hunger.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more