The choice between liberals

David Limbaugh:

Quoted material removed. You may read the original at the link above.
Actually, I have not forgotten any of those things. If he is elected President I will still oppose him on those issues. He will be a troublesome President who will make a lot more enemies than friends. If I vote for him, it will be reluctantly.

But my biggest issue is the war. After the Democrats screwed up Vietnam and were proud of the mess they made, I determined never to vote for them again and to work for their defeat. On the issue of winning in Iraq a case can be made for supporting McCain over any Democrat in the race. Winning in Iraq will discredit liberalism like no other issue.

They have embraced defeat and staked the future of their party on the issue. We should beat them, and the enemy and help destroy the Democrats credibility on national security for generations to come. I think it is the choice Reagan would make. It is certainly my choice.

If it is unpatriotic for Democrats to campaign for our defeat in Iraq, it is equally unpatriotic for Republicans to put their differences with McCain ahead of supporting the troops and winning the war. If Republicans put their disagreements on policy ahead of victory in Iraq shame on them. What we have to do is to let McCain know the limits of his mandate. It does not extend much beyond winning the war and limiting spending.

Comments

  1. Brooks4:49 PM

    Let's see, what do I, as a liberal, support?

    ...to suppress political speech - HELL NO

    punish producers (OF WHAT?), oil companies and drug companies YES, IF THEY DESERVE TO BE PUNISHED FOR SCREWING HARD WORKING PEOPLE

    open wider our borders - NO
    cater to the whacko environmental movement and its junk-science-driven pseudo-consensus on global warming ARE YOU KIDDING? YOU REALLY THINK THIS ISN'T HAPPENING?

    nominate judges who don't "wear their conservatism on their sleeve," YES YES YES. NO MORE EVANGELISTS (OF JESUS AND CORPORATIONS) ON THE BENCH

    close Gitmo YES. TOMORROW.

    confer constitutional civil liberties on enemy combatants TORTURE IS TORTURE

    end life-saving interrogation techniques SEE ABOVE

    demonize evangelical conservatives AND END THEIR HYPOCRITICAL TYRANNY

    and obstruct efforts of conservative Republican legislators YES. AMEN.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more