Conviction in Houston Taliban case

Houston Chronicle:

One of four men accused in the so-called Houston Taliban case was found guilty Tuesday of unlawful possession of a firearm.

Shiraz Syed Qazi, 26, waived his right to a jury trial, opting for a decision from U.S. District Court Judge Lee Rosenthal. The trial lasted 15 minutes.

Qazi and the others arrested last year are accused of material support of terrorism by training to fight with the Taliban against U.S.-led forces.

A July 2005 camping trip in Willis, north of Conroe, was part of the conspiracy, FBI officials have said. Agents used Qazi's acknowledgment that "he overheard statements over that weekend" to help connect him to the terrorist plot.

Qazi, a Pakistani, appears in photographs with a semi-automatic weapon.

His supporters have said he went on a weekend shooting trip, which is common recreation in Texas.

Federal public defender Brent Newton, who is representing Qazi, filed court papers acknowledging that Qazi knowingly possessed a semi-automatic weapon.

...

After court, Newton told Qazi's family and friends that the maximum punishment is 10 years in prison. But, he said, Qazi likely will serve one year because of his clean criminal record.

Government officials contend it is illegal for a person with a nonimmigrant visa to possess a firearm.

...

Before his arrest in late November, Qazi attended Houston Community College on a student visa.

The men's supporters have created a Web site and blog called "Houston Muslims Falsely Accused" at www.faketerror.com.

The site calls the four men "Muslims falsely arrested on make-believe terrorism charges to cause 'fake terror.' "

Qazi's supporters in the courtroom included a representative of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the nation's largest Muslim civil liberties group.

...


The story goes on to describe others charged at the same time for similar or more serious violations. The CAIR connection to the defendants is interesting. The organization has had ties to Hamas and it has aggressively tried to defend Muslims in this country who have come under suspicion in terror related cases.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more