Abraham accords survive changes of goverment

 Washington Examiner:

Two years ago this weekend, a phone call took place between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al Nahyan, then crown prince of the United Arab Emirates. Arranged by President Donald Trump and senior adviser Jared Kushner, it set in motion normalization agreements now collectively known as the Abraham Accords. Though the call wasn’t so long ago, I’m comfortable calling what transpired afterward “extraordinary,” because, in international affairs, two years is a lifetime.

Since that fateful call, Israel has had two new prime ministers, and it’s headed toward yet another election. Sheikh Mohammed has been elevated to become ruler and president of his nation. Sudan has undergone several meaningful challenges to its stability. Morocco has a freshly minted government. The Kosovo-Serbia relationship has endured renewed tension. Islamic terrorists have launched over 4,900 rockets targeting civilians in Israel. And the Biden administration has relentlessly pursued the reinstatement of the Iran nuclear deal.

In the past, any one of these developments would have had a domino effect, knocking the Middle East back years in terms of progress. It turns out that the Abraham Accords not only are resilient themselves but also provide the Middle East with resilience. That’s because their framework and platform optimistically focus on the present and future and readily discard the failed conventions of the past. Participant nations have benefited in terms of economics and collaboration. Even Jordan and Egypt are beginning to enjoy the benefits of a warmer relationship with Israel.

But there is more work to be done — actually, much more is needed to be done. The current task is just getting back to neutral, as it took the current administration nearly two years to accept that the Accords are good for our allies and good for America.

Admittedly, President Joe Biden has come a long way since his State Department spokesman Ned Price pettily refused even to utter the words “Abraham Accords.” On his trip to the Middle East last month — his first since becoming president — Biden praised the Accords and touted the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s decision to lift restrictions on civilian air carriers as “historic.”

These are positive steps. However, the single most definitive action the United States could take to bring more peace, stability, and prosperity to the Middle East would be to return to the Trump administration’s policy on Iran immediately. Specifically, the Biden administration should hold the Islamic Republic to former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s 12 requirements for rejoining the community of nations.

...

Biden is stuck on stupid when it comes to Iran and Obama's terrible deal.  It was a deal that made no sense and it's unlikely the Abraham Accords would have ever been done were it not for Trump smartly dumping the Iran deal. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more