Sen. Hirono stumbles into Rosentein's exoneration of Trump

Red States:

...
Rosenstein disbursed her of the conspiracy saying he never was involved in any such scheme, that he never recorded Trump and never suggested he could be removed by the 25th Amendment.

But while she was doing that, she made the case for the Administration. She got Rosenstein to say that he agreed that there was no evidence of obstruction of justice. She kept pressing and Rosenstein said that “he agrees that there was no evidence of a crime” by Trump. He also confirmed that no one was in favor of prosecution. Thanks, Mazie, for destroying Democrats’ lie yet again.

Law professor Jonathan Turley picked up on it.

Sen. Hirono seems to be making a case for the Administration. She just prompted Rosenstein to say that he agreed with the view that there was no evidence of obstruction of justice. She prompted Rosenstein to say that “he agrees that there was no evidence of a crime” by Trump.

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) June 3, 2020

…Hirono pressed Rosenstein on how a “1000 prosecutors disagreed” with him. Rosenstein said “we have a lot more than 1000 former prosecutors.” He said that they did not know the full record. He did. Rosenstein said it was unfair. “Nobody was in favor of prosecution.”

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) June 3, 2020

So there was no evidence, but because of the Obama administration and the Mueller investigation, we spent God knows how much, and the country was seriously damaged and divided by these actions. There was so much harm it would be hard to calculate out of this.
...

That rebuts the Democrats' whole excuse for pushing the hoax in the first place.  The mainstream media missed this important information by ignoring the hearings.  They continue their own cover-up of their collusion with the deep state traitors in pushing the fraud to begin with.