AG blast Dem tilted redistricting decision

Houston Chronicle:
Attorney General Greg Abbott slammed federal court-proposed changes to the state's congressional map in a legal filing Friday, claiming the court overstepped its bounds, and accused it of “undermining the democratic process.”
The three-judge panel, which oversaw a key redistricting trial in San Antonio, proposed significant changes to the Legislature's congressional redistricting plan that could give Democrats another three congressional seats and put another three seats in play.
“A court's job is to apply the law, not to make policy,” lawyers for the state wrote in their filing. “A federal court lacks constitutional authority to interfere with the expressed will of the State Legislature unless it is compelled to remedy a specific, identifiable violation of law.”
The filing comes on the heels of Abbott's latest legal volley, which was launched Wednesday when he asked the San Antonio federal court to stay the implementation of its now finalized changes to the Texas House and Senate maps. Abbott also said that he would ask for the court to stay its congressional plan if it is not substantially changed.
If the judges refuse, Abbott said, he'll take the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The new move comes as Republicans continue to tally the political damage from the court's redistricting maps for the Texas House and Senate, which preserved a Democratic senator's seat in Fort Worth and could put an additional six to 10 Texas House seats into play, including that of State Rep. Aaron Peña, R-Edinburg, who said Thursday he would not seek re-election.
Lauren Bean, a spokeswoman for Abbott, said, “We cannot allow any map that so grossly misapplies federal law and continues a trend of inappropriately venturing into political policy-making to move forward unchallenged.”
... 
Any plan that favors Democrats is irrational when you consider statewide voting patterns.  This kind of jury rigging is what perpetuated Democrat control of Congressional races for years.  The Civil rights Division of the Justice Department is run by radical Democrats who are pushing the Democrat agenda rather than any attempt at fairness.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more