When will GOP candidate emerge to challenge Obama

"At his press conference today, Governor ...Image via Wikipedia
Perry Bacon, Jr., Washington Post:

His approval ratings are below 50 percent. Americans aren’t satisfied with the economy, gas prices or his handling of a number of situations abroad. A number of the states he won in 2008, such as Indiana, would be difficult for President Obama if the election were held today.

So why aren’t a line of Republicans ready to run against him? Haley Barbour, Mississippi’s governor, bowed out Monday, joining a number of prominent Republicans, such as New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who have opted against challenging the president in 2012.

Barbour said he didn’t have the “absolute fire in the belly,” while political strategists say it’s hard to imagine him winning the presidency. And Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) is expected to form an exploratory committee today. But here are a few reasons the GOP field so far is smaller than expected.

1. Money: “$1 billion,” said Terry Holt, a former adviser to George W. Bush, when asked why more candidates haven’t joined the Republican field.
GOP strategists argue whatever Obama raises, be it the $1 billion figure that has been floated or simply matching the $750 million of 2008, is a major obstacle to many Republican candidates. Other than former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, most of the potential GOP contenders both lack an existing major fundraising base or personal wealth that would make it easy to fund a campaign.

2. Timing: A number of the GOP’s most impressive figures, such as Rep. Paul Ryan (Wis.), Sen. Marco Rubio (Fla.) and Christie, could opt against running in 2012 and instead run in 2016. Christie was elected in 2009, Rubio last year.

...
He has some more reasons, but I think the money challenge is the one that needs to be addressed right now. The circumstances under which Obama raised do not exist today for him or for other candidates. By waiting the GOP candidate will get more bang for their buck by pushing their message in a shorter time frame.

I think it unlikely that Obama will raise $750 million this time much less a billion. First, he is not that popular and is not going to get the millions of small contributions he got last time. If he starts spending big bucks up front he is liable to get into the same predicament that John McCain found himself in in 2008 where he went big and then could not afford to maintain his operation.

There really is no hurry. I don't see voters of either party pining for an early campaign, although some in the media may do so.

There will be some solid Republican candidates with executive experience to challenge Obama and now that Barbour is not in the race he can lend his formidable skills to the contest.

On the money front many of the heavy hitters for Obama and the Democrats have switched teams.
Related articles
Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more