Gays in the landing craft


Michael Ramirez looks at the focus on Gays in the military. I think it is an overblown issue. I also think Adm. Mullins was wrong to say the Don't ask, Don't tell policy forced anyone to lie about themselves. The fact is that gays are a rather small minority to begin with, and a small minority of gays wish to be in the military, and the current policy permits that service. How many of those who do serve want to be singled out for their sexuality? Click on the image for a larger view.

Comments

  1. Greg8:50 PM

    Gotta disagree, PP. Under current policy, if Seaman Bob Smith and Seaman Miranda Garcia are off duty, out of uniform and walking down the street on base holding hands (much less kiss in public), there will be no consequences for that. On the other hand, if Seaman Bob Smith and Seaman Manuel Garcia do the same thing, they will likely be investigated and discharged under DADT. In short, the two men in the latter example are being asked to lie about themselves, concealing that which straight servicemen and women are permitted to freely reveal. They don't want to be singled out for their sexuality -- they want to be left alone about it when they engage in what would be seen as perfectly acceptable behavior for a heterosexual couple. Rather than "Don't Ask, Don't tell", the policy needs to be "Don't Ask, Don't Give A Damn If Someone Does Tell".

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more