The Dead Man Statute prohibits testimony from the grave

Don Surber:

If true, Bob Woodward’s piece “Ford Disagreed With Bush About Invading Iraq.” By running it after Ford died, Woodward just reminds people of his fake-but-accurate interview with Bob Casey.

Jules Crittenden of the Boston Herald put it succinctly: “Woodward chants up a Ford zombie.”

Woodward has it on tape? Play it on Fox News then.

UPDATE: Thomas DeFrank of the New York Daily News recalled his final lunch with Ford this year:
Ford was a few weeks shy of his 93rd birthday as we chatted for about 45 minutes. He'd been visited by President Bush three weeks earlier and said he'd told Bush he supported the war in Iraq but that the 43rd President had erred by staking the invasion on weapons of mass destruction.

"Saddam Hussein was an evil person and there was justification to get rid of him," he observed, "but we shouldn't have put the basis on weapons of mass destruction. That was a bad mistake. Where does [Bush] get his advice?"
Woodward tarnished his reputation even more.

...
DeFrank's story sounds more credible. The Dead Man Statute prohibits hearsay evidence of a conversation with someone who is not alive to refute. Woodward had a similar "conversation" with a comatose Bill Casey for one of his books. I just do not trust Bob Woodward with this story. What Ford told DeFranks is not only credible, but sound advice. I do think the source of the WMD strategy was probably Tony Blair, to answer Ford's question.

Comments

  1. tm12:05 PM

    "Woodward has it on tape? Play it on Fox News then."

    I don't think he'll do that just to satisfy a handful of conspiracy theory crackpots.

    You're missing the boat on the dead man statute. Woodward and Ford aren't adverse parties.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Prariepundit3:12 PM

    The story makes them sound adverse to the war.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more