Terrorist rights crowd still trying userp Presidential powers

NY Times:

Senior Bush administration officials said Wednesday that it would be impractical for them to obtain individual warrants every time they needed to eavesdrop on a conversation suspected of involving Al Qaeda. They urged Congress to approve a proposal that critics said would give the president broad, unchecked powers.

...
The fact is the President already has the power as commander in chief in war time to intercept enemy communications. To suggest that warrants are needed in war time to intercept those communications is nonsense on stilts. On top of that, the critics have shown not one example of the President abusing this power. Every instance has been in furtherence of the war effort and protecting Americans. Requiring him to jump through hoops in order to do that is ridiculous. Only a liberal could be this dense.

Comments

  1. BGGB10:45 AM

    Every instance has been in furtherence of the war effort and protecting Americans.

    Part of my opposition to giving Bush free reign to do whatever he wants is the potential future abuse of these powers. Let's say for argument's sake that Bush has only used this power for the causes of good. What's to stop the next president from abusing this power? The war on terrorism requires great power to be concentrated in the hands of the President. But that doesn't mean we should mindlessly throw all checks and balances out the window.

    I fully believe it is possible for Bush to use preexisting channels (such as FISA) and fight terrorists at the same time.


    Requiring him to jump through hoops in order to do that is ridiculous. Only a liberal could be this dense

    Nice.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more