WaPo porn

Washington Times Editorial:

It is difficult to understand what useful journalistic purpose was served by the new photographs of Iraqi prisoner mistreatment published in Friday's edition of The Washington Post. As The Post itself acknowledged in one of two front-page stories about the pictures, the images do not shed any light on the central question of who directed the abuse of detainees at Abu Ghraib prison. So The Post, by its own admission, adds no useful information on perhaps the most basic issue in the case. As for the stories that accompany the picture, if true, they would simply reinforce what was already known: There were rotten soldiers at this prison, who deserve to be severely punished and kicked out of the military.
When it comes to the serious problems at Abu Ghraib, two distinct approaches seem to have evolved: the careful, deliberative approach taken by the military, and the sensationalist, voyeuristic approach adopted by The Post and others in the media. Here is a partial list of what the military has done to address the problems: On Jan. 13, the abuses came to the attention of military commanders in Iraq. One day later, the Army's criminal investigation began. By the end of January, Maj.-Gen. Antonio Taguba began his investigation, one which produced a copiously documented report on the abuses at Abu Ghraib. (Gen. Taguba's report included the first set of photographs that were leaked to the New Yorker's Seymour Hersh and published several weeks ago.) The Army has been investigating Army Reserve training practices. In March, Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt announced that the military had filed criminal charges against six soldiers in the investigation. Today, one soldier has been convicted and imprisoned in connection with Abu Ghraib, and six more are awaiting trial. Others have received letters of reprimand and/or been relieved of their responsibilities.

...

Whether the motivation was meretricious, partisan or antiwar, it was meant to excite rather than to elucidate — and thus was journalistic pornography.


A point made here earlier.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more