Smollett's implausible story comes a cropper

 Washington Examiner Editorial:

The story of Jussie Smollett and the implausible hate crime attack against him is now familiar to nearly everyone.

Smollett, a little-known actor on a long-running Fox television show, claimed to have been walking down the street minding his own business at 2 a.m. in downtown Chicago when he was attacked by two white Trump supporters wearing red "Make America Great Again" hats who made reference to his race (he is black), his sexual orientation (he is gay), and the obscure television show on which he appeared. The attackers allegedly placed a noose around his neck and threw bleach at him, informing him that "this is Trump country." Had any of this actually happened, it might have been the first time in human history that anyone ever said such a thing of downtown Chicago.

Smollett, somehow managing to escape this unlikely incident with his life, called his agent, clothesline noose still dangling around his neck, and told his implausible tale. In reality, he knew both of his attackers, two Nigerian brothers (both black) who testified against him at trial and whose account is completely borne out by all of the video surveillance and GPS and phone records that police were able to unearth.

The brothers say that Smollett paid them to attack him — indeed, he wrote them a check. There are text messages between them, and there is even video of Smollett taking the two through a dry run of the staged crime the day before it happened.

If not for the abundance of video evidence showing all of this, a lot of extremely credulous people would still be saying that Smollett was the victim of a hate crime, as if downtown Chicago in 2019 was practically the same as the Birmingham, Alabama, of 1959.

...

The editorial recommends the maximum sentence for this farce.  Perhaps that would make people think twice about faking hate crimes. 

See, also:

Biden, Harris led frenzy to amplify Jussie Smollett's false hate crime claims 
Multiple politicians called the attack an attempted 'modern day lynching'

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more