Hillary leads in donor give backs

Washington Times:

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential campaign has cut nearly $1.3 million in refund checks to hundreds of donors since July 1 — more than triple what the rest of the Democratic field returned to supporters combined, new campaign filings show.

Mrs. Clinton returned nearly 700 contributions to individual donors, including $804,850 to 249 donors linked to disgraced Democratic fundraiser Norman Hsu.

Several donors contacted yesterday declined to discuss why they received refunds. A woman who answered the phone number registered to San Francisco donor Wai King Yeung, to whom the Clinton campaign reimbursed $4,600, said she did not speak English.

Mr. Hsu was charged last month in federal court in New York with running a massive Ponzi scheme. A major Democratic fundraiser, the New York businessman also faces charges he contributed to various campaigns using straw donors as a front, threatening investors if they did not support his favored candidates.

Howard Wolfson, a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton, yesterday said the campaign "acted out of an abundance of caution" in returning the money.

"We had no knowledge that these individuals made donations using Mr. Hsu's or anybody else's money," Mr. Wolfson said. "But we decided to return the money."

Campaigns return donations for a host of reasons, from correcting accounting mistakes to trying to control potential political fallout, said Bradley Smith, a former commissioner for the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

...

They have all sent back varying amounts of money, but Hillary Clinton has received the most contributions from suspect sources and thus had to make the most refunds. The story does not discuss any contributions to charitable causes of suspect funds from donors like Hsu, although that is what Clinton said she would do with his donations. It is also not clear that some of the funds returned to what may have been nominee donors may have come from Hsu who apparently stole most of his money in a Ponzi scheme swindle.

Suitably Flip questions whether Clinton has made a full refund to all the Hsu donors. Apparently no refunds have been sent from her senate campaign committee. The LA Times has more on the donors not getting their contribution back. This is a political mistake. If there is more discussion on this issue she will have to refund the senate donations too. Otherwise she risks looking like slick Hillary.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more